atrial fibrillation, ablation, hybrid, epicardial, endocardial, sinus rhythm, flutter
Background: An epicardial/endocardial (hybrid) ablation approach has emerged as an option to treat a difficult population of patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). Limited information exists on the importance of AF termination as a predictor of clinical outcome during hybrid ablation.
Purpose: This retrospective study aimed to demonstrate the significance of spontaneous AF termination during hybrid ablation of persistent AF.
Methods: We studied results from 63 consecutive hybrid ablations in patients with no prior ablation, a mean (± standard deviation) persistent AF duration of 19 ± 16 months and a mean follow-up of 27 ± 13 months. Patients received both epicardial ablation of the posterior left atrial wall using a small midline approach and a stepwise endocardial ablation (pulmonary vein isolation, ablation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms and/or linear lesions) with AF termination as the procedural endpoint. Spontaneous AF termination during the procedure was defined as conversion of AF to either sinus rhythm or atrial flutter (AFL), which subsequently converted to sinus rhythm during the above ablation techniques (Group 1). For patients not terminating to sinus rhythm with the above steps, electrical and/or pharmacological cardioversion was used (Group 2). Arrhythmia-free survival was defined as no arrhythmia (AFL or AF) following an initial 90-day period. To determine time to arrhythmia, ambulatory monitoring and/or electrocardiogram results during follow-up visits were collected. Arrhythmia-free survival at 12 months was determined using Kaplan-Meier estimates.
Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in baseline characteristics such as age, duration of persistent AF, body mass index, CHA2DS2-VASc score, left atrial size, or left ventricular ejection fraction (P = ns for all). There also was no significant difference in total ablation time between the two groups (P = 0.1). Arrhythmia-free survival at 12 months for those with (Group 1) and without (Group 2) spontaneous AF termination during the procedure was 56% and 58%, respectively (P = 0.7). AF-free survival was not significantly different between Group 1 and Group 2 (74% vs 79%, P = 0.9), nor was AFL-free survival (66% vs 57%, P = 0.4).
Conclusion: Spontaneous conversion to sinus rhythm during the ablation procedure versus the need for cardioversion is not a good predictor of clinical outcome in a challenging population of patients with a long history of persistent AF who undergo the hybrid ablation procedure.
Erickson L, Kress DC, Zahwe F, Mengesha T, Krum D, Sra JS. Is spontaneous termination of atrial fibrillation during hybrid ablation a predictor of clinical outcome in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation? J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2018;5:327.